Robert J. Hansen wrote: > On 10/29/2012 2:05 PM, User wrote: >> You may want to take a look at GPGshell for an alternative. > > GPGshell is not Free Software, and for that reason it's not exactly > appropriate to recommend it on this list. Whether we agree or disagree > with the Free Software Foundation -- I personally disagree with them, > and particularly RMS, an awful lot -- the fact remains that GnuPG is a > GNU project, and we should respect their rules when we're participating > on an official GNU mailing list. :) > > What about GPGshell do you find to be a clear win over GPA? How can the > GPA maintainers make GPA competitive with GPGshell?
OTOH, WinPT _IS_ Free in the RMS-sense. Its feature set is much closer to that of GPGshell. http://winpt.wald.intevation.org/ -- John P. Clizbe Inet: John (a) Gingerbear DAWT net SKS/Enigmail/PGP-EKP or: John ( @ ) Enigmail DAWT net FSF Assoc #995 / FSFE Fellow #1797 hkp://keyserver.gingerbear.net or mailto:pgp-public-k...@gingerbear.net?subject=HELP Q:"Just how do the residents of Haiku, Hawai'i hold conversations?" A:"An odd melody / island voices on the winds / surplus of vowels"
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
