thx On 09/10/2012 10:21 AM, gnupg-users-requ...@gnupg.org wrote: > Send Gnupg-users mailing list submissions to > gnupg-users@gnupg.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > gnupg-users-requ...@gnupg.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > gnupg-users-ow...@gnupg.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Gnupg-users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: A safe text editor (No such Client) > 2. Re: A safe text editor (Peter Lebbing) > 3. Re: A safe text editor (Marco Steinacher) > 4. Re: A safe text editor (antispa...@sent.at) > 5. Re: A safe text editor (Milo) > 6. Re: gpgme passphrase_cb (problem solved) (John Morris) > 7. Errormessage KGPG in Mint KDE 13 (Albrecht Will) > 8. Re: Errormessage KGPG in Mint KDE 13 (Tobias Mueller) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 22:12:08 +0200 > From: No such Client <nosuchcli...@gmail.com> > To: gnupg users <gnupg-users@gnupg.org> > Subject: Re: A safe text editor > Message-ID: <504cf818.8030...@gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > On 09/09/2012 10:04 PM, antispa...@sent.at wrote: >> >> It's sad to see that Pretty Good Privacy is just about pretty good and >> nothing more. People don't seem to care beyond playing 007. > Finally, *someone* gets it. You always have to push the bar of sec and > crypto. Not wallow in routines and complacency. That is how people get > sloppy, and dogma sets in.. > >> In a way >> it's dramatic given the Industriaised World is all about crunching data. >> Jake Applebaum was right: people should read IBM and the Holocaust. >> >> >> > > Or a modern-day equivalent, how western defence companies knowingly > sell/give/transfer armanents to embargoed powers, (cough China, Iran, > DPRK) either directly or indirectly against their own or friendly > soldiers/civilians ? > > > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: signature.asc > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 195 bytes > Desc: OpenPGP digital signature > URL: </pipermail/attachments/20120909/12269bef/attachment-0001.pgp> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 23:02:30 +0200 > From: Peter Lebbing <pe...@digitalbrains.com> > To: antispa...@sent.at > Cc: gnupg-users@gnupg.org > Subject: Re: A safe text editor > Message-ID: <504d03e6.5000...@digitalbrains.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > On 09/09/12 22:04, antispa...@sent.at wrote: >> It's sad to see that Pretty Good Privacy is just about pretty good and >> nothing more. People don't seem to care beyond playing 007. > > Are you talking about how an encryption/signing tool is not a text editor?? > What's with the sudden demeaning criticism? > > Peter. > > PS: I must say I'm a bit surprised nobody here seems to know any good > secret-text-editors. I just fail to see how this is a failure of OpenPGP or > GnuPG. Or the people here. >
-- Cyrus G. Jones <jo...@atmo.arizona.edu> Institute of Atmospheric Physics <cy...@dakotacom.net> University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona 85721 (520) 444-7662 _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
