On 07/08/12 15:18, Jay Litwyn wrote: > I submitted this revokation certificate to a couple of servers and > they said it was malformed, > and I had trouble guessing how to generate anything different. So, I > imported the revokation certificate, exported the whole key, and > submitted that. It worked.
Now, I haven't ever revoked a key, but I wouldn't be surprised if this is how it is supposed to work. After all, the revocation certificate is just a special type of signature. You don't upload signatures to a keyserver, you upload keys with signatures to a keyserver. The keyserver then merges in all the signatures it has on that key. > gpg (GnuPG) 1.2.2 > Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc. That's old. Like, really old. Why do you use such an old version? As for PGP 2.6.3, I believe the idea (IDEA? :) is that if you really still want to use that, you have to be prepared for some struggles to get all sides communicating. That's the price you pay. Peter. -- I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigmail. You can send me encrypted mail if you want some privacy. My key is available at http://wwwhome.cs.utwente.nl/~lebbing/pubkey.txt _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
