-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Robert J. Hansen wrote: > On 7/10/2012 4:58 AM, Andy Ruddock wrote: >> I used the information in this article : > > It is still substantially accurate and useful, as near as I can tell. > (I still think cert-digest-algo sha256 is unnecessary at this point in > time, but I understand why he believes otherwise, and his perspective is > hardly an unreasoned one.)
Good to hear it, thank you. Crypto is one of those areas where it is easy to make a mess of things, so I think it's best to leave it to the experts. The problem then, of course, is determining who can be judged expert. - -- Andy Ruddock - ------------ andy.rudd...@rainydayz.org (GPG Key ID 0xB0324245) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJP+/TaAAoJECqtbbewMkJFIq0QAIR5MzIx7my7726PeN1l1Rff Ut1EFvj4xtLLfa2ilplpMCh+KsMIEAjBNxPHIZGRjaIUbuY8Gi6PN1eXF8IVoWr3 5BakwSwPW52+3I8BjRXWy0G1IT4NDfYyeSn/prXUisNsRFeR3XxYwGwlqME8cmeo e6LUs1tIT/cskadLRJ003ymTPXFwTB3UdSXMN+Pi2BkAo5kJE6gJTFezsOyP1Eub rau/IijrVT8BHP1p/DstHnc1SkZJS148qXfwBYvJEy/yrU2x7YZHQTnIlISxKn2M DhFSf6UNrxyB4V7mFnMchDAIFshXQrQ/lkdj0v4wHoREWArP15JhMsjgJaAE4NqN 3Yffa5SC3GSAZWL5A42/LQIKKP13akbNqGwH40tygcjmG4YxDs3JlrBD0VnQNLGH jYTtZfT7TyYlJDaTGl3BbHF498y6Imu4TNTZqiWZH5c8Ue3yFi/feD2r1GH98yAG I47e+iaiwhmh40Iu/BJhXlR+F54dKmcIPj8U1Ip2ywO/6x6fWkI56XrRQp4/BFSb HPZBu2Bg+3KCesIKyeb5Tv3m1qU7Is7YggeoMhIAo0U0COY37AewBGh7CkDzayKi rCwTZDv+3HPNPkNjYHxnTyJtUhpOVewgswI8VrW3kUGDlS3RcceP/0Rr4USvbnk5 +F420yI/keYGepSBWzzC =acaH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
