On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 05:31, r...@sixdemonbag.org said:
> results can check for themselves. Warning: if you ever write Python
> code like this in the real world your programming team will beat you to
> death.
To me this awk script is more readable, although most other will
disagree:
$ gpg2 --gen-random 0 262144 | time gpg2 --always-trust --batch -ea \
$(gpg2 --with-colons -k | awk -F: \
'$1=="pub" && $2~/[fmu]/ && $12~/[E]/ {print "-r "$5;if(++cnt>50){exit}}')\
>/dev/null
resulting in
0.32user 0.03system 0:01.00elapsed
On a slower machine but likely with another state of the entropy pool.
I use only keys which are usable as indicated by the "$2~/[fmu]/"
condition and which have at least one encryption subkey ("$12~/[E]/").
I need this test because I have some invalid keys (Elgamal signatures)
in my ring.
I actually found a bug in GPG: If a key has been disabled, it is not
flagged as disabled in the --with-colons key listing. I need to
investigate that closer - might be the reason for bugs reported to GUI
frontends.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
