On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 17:13 +0100, Martin Gollowitzer wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently trying to do a smal script that sends automated e-mail > messages on a regular basis. I want to sign those e-mails and since mutt > does not allow to use it's OpenPGP features in non-interactive mode, I > try to at least have these messages signed using inline PGP. > For this, I use the following commands on a Debian squeeze machine: > > cat $file | gpg --no-verbose --batch --quiet --output - --passphrase > "<passphrase>" --armor --textmode --clearsign > $tmpfile > mail -s "<Subject>" $address < $tmpfile > > The problem is that I get a "BAD SIGNATURE from …" when verifying the > signature in mutt. I'm not entirely sure, but I think the problem has to > do with the encoding. I'm not very talented in shell scripting, so any > help is highly appreciated. Of course if you know a way to send > automated PGP/MIME signed messages, that would be even better. > > Thanks, > Martin
You may need to add header: ---------------------------- Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature" "5. OpenPGP signed data" section may help: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2015.txt http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3156.txt > _______________________________________________ > Gnupg-users mailing list > Gnupg-users@gnupg.org > http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
