On 2012-01-28 07:57, Doug Barton wrote: > On 01/27/2012 21:48, Jerome Baum wrote: >> On 2012-01-28 06:14, Robert J. Hansen wrote: > This is the second (third?) time this has come up in the recent past. > Maybe instead of talking more about it those who are interested in > having this functionality should go create it? Then the community would > have something concrete to discuss. > > If it really is as simple as you describe, I can't see any reason why > people wouldn't want to deploy it. :)
I'm not interested in having this functionality. I'm just interested in the problem (and only from a theoretical perspective). Personally I don't think it makes sense to support no-modify on keyservers -- if I want to publish a signature I create, I can, and the owner of the key can not stop me. -- PGP: A0E4 B2D4 94E6 20EE 85BA E45B 63E4 2BD8 C58C 753A PGP: 2C23 EBFF DF1A 840D 2351 F5F5 F25B A03F 2152 36DA -- nameserver 217.79.186.148 nameserver 178.63.26.172 http://opennicproject.org/ -- No situation is so dire that panic cannot make it worse.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
