-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi
On Saturday 17 December 2011 at 4:34:23 PM, in <mid:4eecc48f.1080...@jeromebaum.com>, Jerome Baum wrote: > On 2011-12-17 16:42, Aaron Toponce wrote: >> I guess Anonymous or LULZ Security, or the like, could do it out of sheer >> entertainment, but it would die quickly, as the effort in maintaining the >> noise outweighs the benefit of annoying users by several orders of >> magnitude. > I think the point was that with the current keyserver > setup, it wouldn't die off at all and there is > basically no cost to maintaining the noise. You can > easily grow the database to a crazy size and it'll be > difficult to shrink it back down, as the keyservers > keep syncing and you have to coordinate the entire > network or the noise will just keep coming back. I guess that either breaks (or at least greatly shrinks) the network. Or else the coding effort is put into solving a problem that actually exists, and a new generation of keyservers comes into being. At the moment the problem doesn't exist. - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:expires2...@ymail.com Don't talk unless you can improve on the silence -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQCVAwUBTuzH76ipC46tDG5pAQpGwAQAiYFio5Gi8ve+zS3Lxbabf4ZVtxDA/DhR RTeIc/NC/MX7T1g1/wylf66D31FE/xtHI5sxK8cVEb0h9RP26MD9gleHf1SFxJ+e K6oFKqTEhRpF9l1NL+bY2CfiR0NfWwDjFPVqHOc53l5pt+2ocCVfU2+Zs+2z+AUk tA9wdikdgNo= =t/ob -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
