On 25/10/11 17:09, Robert J. Hansen wrote: > I disagree. The problem with the current proposal is it offers email > providers no payoff for their work. If it could credibly be said, > "implement STEED and you'll get 25% less spam across your network," > email providers would be lining up around the block to participate.
Yes, and if it could credibly be said "implement STEED and you'll get 10% more clients", you'd need crowd control. Unfortunately, both "ifs" are not met. When you try to create the perfect standard that solves all e-mail problems, it quickly becomes a terrible mess. You need focus and compartmentalisation, draw some boundaries. Peter. -- I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigmail. You can send me encrypted mail if you want some privacy. My key is available at http://wwwhome.cs.utwente.nl/~lebbing/pubkey.txt _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
