On 9/30/2011 8:57 PM, Marcio B. Jr. wrote:
> http://lwn.net/Articles/461236/

Before people panic, there are no known weaknesses in DSA.  The SHA-1
hash algorithm has some severe problems, but there's nothing in DSA that
requires the use of SHA-1: you can replace it with any 160-bit hash.

Let's not panic, and let's not migrate away from DSA without good
reason.  :)  Migrate away from SHA-1, sure, but DSA is fine.


_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Reply via email to