On 9/30/2011 8:57 PM, Marcio B. Jr. wrote: > http://lwn.net/Articles/461236/
Before people panic, there are no known weaknesses in DSA. The SHA-1 hash algorithm has some severe problems, but there's nothing in DSA that requires the use of SHA-1: you can replace it with any 160-bit hash. Let's not panic, and let's not migrate away from DSA without good reason. :) Migrate away from SHA-1, sure, but DSA is fine. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users