On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 01:49:52PM -0700, Robert J. Hansen wrote: > (...) > > -- it's just not something I can answer. Coherency and security are > matters of personal taste and policy.
Are you sure about that? then find a person who will tell you that (you like thought experiments, don't you?) during obvious live threat situation feels secure. You can imaging what will be a common anwser, right? Defining from the scratch all the terms and dictionaries before starting conversation is somehow bogus. Robert, if you will look around you will find fine and common/universal-enough definitions of security in context adequate to this thread. If you doubt about that start a thread for revisiting - for example - wikipedia's terms regarding IT/information security stuff. I think that most people (and I'm saying about _most_ of them) will agree that there are fine. Perhaps instead of serving extreme form of relativism is better to not anwser at all. I think that informative and didactic value of such response is negligible. -- Kind regards, Milo _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
