How about putting it on to twitter so it can be archived into the LOC? On May 5, 2011, at 6:46 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> For the latter, I don't get it -- it's not like keeping the key secret takes >> a lot of effort -- but it does decrease your security ever so slightly. >> Besides proving a point, why would you publish? > > Because the _New York Times_ keeps records of all the papers it's ever > published. It can be seen as a highly effective, if low-tech, long-term > archival solution. Paperkey the private certificate, publish it in the NYT, > verify the accuracy of the published certificate, and presto: your key is > archived for the next 100+ years. > > Honestly, half the reason why I volunteer to publish my certificate in the > NYT is for precisely this reason. I think it'd be kind of cool to (a) have > the NYT be my data archive, and (b) get someone else to pay for it. :) > > (Assuming, of course, the NYT survives its current financial problems. Which > may be a very big if.) > > > _______________________________________________ > Gnupg-users mailing list > Gnupg-users@gnupg.org > http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users Christopher Tran http://christran.in/ 84730CD9
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
