On 03/22/2011 06:06 PM, Jonathan Ely wrote: > I really wish 8192 would become available. Not that it would be the end > all/be all of key security but according to your theory it sounds much > more difficult to crack. >
The actual cutting edge solution is to move from RSA to ECC. Even a 8192 bit or 16k bit RSA key isn't approved by the NSA or NIST for TOP SECRET materials, but ECC-521 is. ECC actually is up-and-running in the beta for gpg 2.1, but realistically it'll be (at least) a few years before it gets mainstream adoption. -- -Grant "Look around! Can you construct some sort of rudimentary lathe?"
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
