On 10/03/11 12:39 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote: > > 4. My suspicion is the number of users covered by (2) is pretty > small.
Very probably, at least at the moment (for the reasons Hauke mentioned). > My suspicion is the number of users impacted by (3) is pretty large. Almost certainly. > My suspicion is we do not have a very good handle on just how > difficult we need to make things, given the resources available to > spammers in (1a). I don't really think the spamming scenario is of great concern. Spammers get email addresses from plenty of other methods and there are better ways to stop spam than preventing your email address from being posted somewhere, including a keyserver. Regards, Ben
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
