On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Denise Schmid <chinati...@gmx.ch> wrote:
> Thanks all for your help. > > Now, the story gets even more funny: They claim to have used PGP split-key, > then encrypted the files with a randomized key, then encrypted the key with > individual keys. > > So far so bad. But now comes the best: They claim that, because one of the > managers wasn't able to remember his mantra, they decided to _delete_ all > encrypted data. > > It sounds as if the whole thing is really nothing else but a bogus... Now > as Vedaal wrote: Best thing that can happen is that they encrypted something > later... > > But I see support for my opinion that the thing smells :-) > > Thanks again > > Denise > > > Is this a movie? -- There's a box?
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
