On Feb 28, 2011, at 5:47 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote: > On 2/28/11 12:10 PM, David Shaw wrote: >> Well, I suppose that's up to you whether you want to trust RM or not. >> A question on trustworthiness is outside crypto, and not what the >> discussion was about here in any event. > > First it was, "even signatures from non-validated keys belonging to > non-trusted persons can be significant, because it establishes > continuity of communications." Now it's, "a question on trustworthiness > is outside crypto."
You know what? I'm finished with this silliness. You're (again) playing debate club games, and I'm just bored of it. See ya. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
