> I'm not at all surprised that you had those results. A limited subset of > people have support for OpenPGP signatures. A limited subset of those people > actually verify signatures. A limited subset of those people actually pay > attention to what those signatures say.
Yes: but one would hope that on PGP-Basics those "limited subsets" would be present in significant numbers, much as on GnuPG-Users. > It is reasonable that if someone was being masqueraded, that person would > speak up and challenge the forger (e.g. "Hey, you're not Martin! I'm the > real Martin, and I can prove it by signing this message with the same key > I've used all along...."). If the real Martin waited for someone else to > notice, well, he may end up waiting for a long time. I'm not sure this is reasonable. If the real Martin doesn't care about what I'm saying, what motive does he have to check the signatures on my messages? _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
