On 02/27/2011 02:04, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
On Saturday, February 26, 2011, MFPA wrote:
Hi
On Friday 25 February 2011 at 1:45:03 AM, in
<mid:87lj14x4yo....@servo.finestructure.net>, Jameson Rollins wrote:
Yikes! I thought we were almost done killing inline
signatures! Don't revive it now!
If PGP/MIME is broken on android, we need to get them
to fix it, not go backwards to inline pgp.
Using inline PGP signatures means using the simpler and more reliable
of the two solutions. The fact that its specification was defined
earlier does not mean using inline signatures is a step backwards;
PGP/MIME is a complement to pgp inline, not a replacement.
The major problem I see with using cleartext signatures in email is the
lack for support of non-ASCII text (or, more precisely, character
encoding).
Can you provide examples that do not work when both the mail client(s)
and gnupg are properly configured to use UTF-8?
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
