Am Mittwoch 12 Januar 2011 06:52:59 schrieb David Shaw: > No. It was generally felt that this was more of an attack on the user of > crypto, rather than on the crypto itself.
That may be a difference to crypto but I doubt that it is a difference to the user... Solutions are better than excuses. And here the solution is simple, it's "just" the usual problem of having to extend an existing standard. Hauke -- PGP: D44C 6A5B 71B0 427C CED3 025C BD7D 6D27 ECCB 5814
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
