On 1/5/2011 4:00 PM, freej...@is-not-my.name wrote: > Then something is very odd. Here's my output, only I used IDEA instead of > 3DES for my test:
You might want to reconsider using IDEA: although it was the bee's knees for the early 1990s, the past twenty years (good /grief/ it's so strange to say that!) have not been kind to it. Don't misunderstand me: I am not saying "IDEA is broken, move away from it." IDEA's margin of safety is presently razor-thin, but it still holds up. It's just that nobody likes a razor-thin safety margin. :) > gpg: WARNING: message was not integrity protected Notice that? That's present in your packet list, but not in mine. You're not using integrity-protected symmetric encryption, so the bit of the RFC I quoted at you doesn't apply. :) > Sounds reasonable but then why is it using RIPEMD160? I tested with 3DES > instead of IDEA and got the same thing. RIPEMD160 is being used, not > SHA1. Thanks for looking at this. Try sharing your gpg.conf file. The answer is probably found in there somewhere. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
