-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 El 14-12-2010 15:23, David Shaw escribió: ... > There is a weak safety factor argument, too. If it turns out that (for > example) AES-256 isn't as strong as expected, it may well be that AES-256 is > actually a good match to RSA-2048, and you were wise to use it instead of > AES-128 (which given the same imaginary attack would be weaker than > RSA-2048). You sort of need a crystal ball to make that argument though...
I wish I had read that message before writing my last reply XD I know I asked before, but I can't remember if I saw an answer. Is TwoFish implementation the 256 bit key version? Best Regards -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJNCAE6AAoJEMV4f6PvczxAtqIH/3a+8kwHqB9WuHDScknpwx+M PCaquhrAoSKbZP06NG/+BH7wq4ChDBz2TLAy0MyUDdu9pb7uQWbu2btppubzxJBB /zJ81qPBg/n1nBLlQ98UMYgIihxriuf+tC4x3JL7t0MhRrt/UaYEZwjdW/Xk1mRn hJKZOiZdaGU23OcIVB4kcQIOo+yUYUatWIgsQDQSKJ2CGAxiWObW1hAaTMh/ZFa+ ppsfB859ULz4mXd85zsOqzrDMQaMRMCZmhJwLmODjspiQb1p5dl5K85PGDVnIt5F shEqgctt3FxEWr4XvLwfrOm+kUwqijxbunWXT5XHqAIher6GwyKFR918A8+bkEE= =ZJ7N -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
