On 11/12/2010 07:28 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote: > 1. Don't optimize code that isn't a bottleneck -- there's nothing wrong > with making GnuPG do unnecessary work so long as that part isn't the > bottleneck.
i was actually hoping to avoid *me* having to do the extra work of
figuring out how to concatenate the data with the signature.
Do you have a suggestion for how to make such a concatenator for
arbitrary 8-bit data? Do i need to build an OpenPGP data packet from my
input stream first? Is there example code of such a concatenator someplace?
> 3. GnuPG is a very mature project that's had a lot of people hammering
> on it. Your own code is probably much newer with far fewer people
> hammering on it.
I grant that my own code is more likely to be buggy than gpg's. that's
another good reason for me to not write a concatenator :)
Are you saying there is no way to pass a detached signature via a file
descriptor?
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
