On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:28:07 +0200, Vjaceslavs Klimovs <vklim...@gmail.com> 
wrote:
> 2048 bit keys are suitable - it's "user+sys" what matters in this case,
> but not "real" by all means, as that includes waiting for passphrase
> input too.
I think this is really a UI issue, in which case "real" is what you
really care about.

An operation that takes >1s is annoying if it needs to be done
frequently, but I'm not sure the operations we're talking about here
really ones that are done that frequently.

jamie.

Attachment: pgpvmHkukpkG5.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Reply via email to