On 8/12/2010 6:19 PM, Harakiri wrote: > This issue has nothing todo with GNUPG. This issue has also nothing > todo with Windows 2003. The issue has something todo that the > original author, and you dont know much about java programming at > all.
Let's scale back the imprecations a little bit. Criticize errors, not people. For instance: > http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-12-2000/jw-1229-traps.html This article is ten years old and is out of date with respect to current Java best practices. Since Java 1.5, the preferred method is ProcessBuilder, which was meant to replace most uses of Runtime.exec(). > and another free advice, dont use some "java class you found on the > net" to integrate in your project. A real developer would never use > code he does not understand, it only leads to ugly legacy code that > experienced developers have to fix after you leave. As a "real developer", I do this almost every workday. You do not know whether the original poster was using this for a deployment system, or as a prototype to explore the problem space. Exploration, testing the limits of your knowledge, and discovering how code works are all parts of the development process. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
