On 3/3/2010 1:44 PM, MFPA wrote: >> I feel there is a strong assumption among OpenPGP users that our >> community is, *ahem*, open. > > Is it not also a reasonable assumption, that those who use and promote > privacy-enhancing software will value and respect privacy?
It is not reasonable that their definition of privacy will overlap with yours, no. I don't get to define what "privacy" means for anyone other than me. You don't get to define what "privacy" means for anyone other than you. Since there is no shared definition of privacy, there can be no reasonable assumption that people who use and promote what *you define to be* privacy-enhancing software will value and respect privacy *according to your definition*. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
