-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi
On Friday 26 February 2010 at 8:39:07 PM, in <mid:97334e1f-ba6f-403e-83eb-51daee32f...@jabberwocky.com>, David Shaw wrote: > On Feb 26, 2010, at 3:37 PM, Grant Olson wrote: >>> Alas, while GnuPG supports the flag, no keyserver >>> does. >>> David >> Just curious... Does support just mean it sets the >> bit? Or will it turn an attempt to --send-keys on >> that key into a no-op? > Support means it gives the user the ability to set and > clear the bit (it is set by default). Would there not be some merit in honouring the flag by (at least) giving an extra warning to answer if you execute --send-keys to upload a key with that bit set? - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:expires2...@ymail.com Don't anthropomorphize computers - they hate it -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQCVAwUBS4g42aipC46tDG5pAQpbhgP/UR/YSCW6ns0SZbrSBaiHVppLI2tZLg2D iGLChDodKWh/OI93e6wlZlxtgDv5ZywdzXcM+8yehCNiW4ifmaHnpA9NAMlYcS/u Uuw5aG/CE1uhnLsnbwX8QzSvUBsaMaLm0oJZRq+2LyippQu/27L4PvS8f1oWKXnp 1eX02sMESpY= =eGNU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
