On Thursday 21 May 2009 15:15:18 Raimar Sandner wrote: > I believe (an I think others do too) it is good praxis to not sign new keys > even if you have signed the old one and the new key is signed by the old > one, without personally checking with the keyholder first. After all, the > new key could have been compromised.
After all the _old_ key could have been compromised, that is what I meant :)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
