On Apr 26, 2009, at 3:54 AM, Raimar Sandner wrote:

On Sunday 26 April 2009 07:00:52 you wrote:
On Apr 25, 2009, at 6:27 PM, Raimar Sandner wrote:
On Saturday 25 April 2009 18:27:44 Raimar Sandner wrote:
Hello,

when gnupg trusts a key as a result of trustdb calculations, I
would like to know what the chain depth for the given key is.

The trustdb actually doesn't store per-user ID depth values.
Rather, one of the many possible depths is stored for the key as a
whole, which is fine for our purposes, but may not give you what
you want here.  Take the case of A signs B(uid1), A signs C(uid1),
and C signs B(uid2).  B is thus fully valid as per B(uid1) being
signed.  But B(uid2) is also valid, and at one level of depth
larger than B(uid1).  B as a whole thus lives at both depth 0 and
depth 1.  We store this as 1, but I think you'd want it at 0.

With "we store this as 1", you mean that when B signs D(uid1), uid1
being the only uid on D, D(uid1) and thus D as a whole is regarded
to be valid at level 2 (given sufficiant ownertrust of B)?

Not exactly. The level for a single-uid key is what you'd expect it to be naturally. The question arises when there are two or more uids on a key, each becoming valid at a different level. For a given key, we store the highest level that covers all of the valid uids, or put another way, the key has the level for the most-distant valid uid. I believe you are looking for the key to have the level of the least- distant valid uid.

I ask that because signatures are made by keys, not by uids. Gpg
regards a signature to be valid, if and only if there is at least
one fully valid uid on the signing key, right? Wouldn't it then be
consistent to regard a key as a whole valid at level n, if it has a
uid signed by a key which has at least one uid being valid at level
n-1?

It would be equally as correct as what we do now. The algorithm doesn't need those levels once the trustdb is built.

David


_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Reply via email to