On Monday 16 February 2009, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:48, faramir...@gmail.com said:
> >> The "signatures not checked" seems pretty self explanatory.  What
> >> does the bad signatures mean?
>
> The signed data does not match the signature.  That is the signed
> data or the signature has been modified or the signature was not
> correctly created initially.

What if the signing key is expired or has been revoked?


Regards,
Ingo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Reply via email to