On Monday 16 February 2009, Werner Koch wrote: > On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:48, faramir...@gmail.com said: > >> The "signatures not checked" seems pretty self explanatory. What > >> does the bad signatures mean? > > The signed data does not match the signature. That is the signed > data or the signature has been modified or the signature was not > correctly created initially.
What if the signing key is expired or has been revoked? Regards, Ingo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users