Alex Amiryan wrote: > Werner Koch wrote: >> On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:40, a...@amiryan.org said: >>> The most popular ones are: >>> hkp://pgp.mit.edu > >> Do not use this server because it runs way too old software! > > What disadvantage have this? What kind of features it is not supporting?
Quoting myself from this list, 13-Oct-2005:
PKS does not handle V4 key features well. Notable examples of mangled
features are multiple subkeys, a revoked subkey (tag 0x28), duplicate
keyids, direct key signatures (tag 0x1F), revocation signatures on userids
(tag 0x30), or photo IDs. There is also no development or maintenance being
done on the pks platform.
--
John P. Clizbe Inet:John (a) Mozilla-Enigmail.org
You can't spell fiasco without SCO. hkp://keyserver.gingerbear.net or
mailto:pgp-public-k...@gingerbear.net?subject=help
Q:"Just how do the residents of Haiku, Hawai'i hold conversations?"
A:"An odd melody / island voices on the winds / surplus of vowels"
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
