On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 05:22:01PM +0100, Peter Thomas wrote: > Hi David. > > One more thing on this: > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 5:18 AM, David Shaw <ds...@jabberwocky.com> wrote: > >> Would gnupg understand these subpackets in a 0x1F signature? > > Yes. It's a valid key as per the spec, even though no program actually > > generates such a key that I know of. Note that I can't make that same > > guarantee for other programs. I suspect they'd work, but you'd have to > > check to be sure. > I had already wrote in another message that I'm trying to do some > interoperability tests (with large keysizes for example). > I'd also like to play with these signature types (0x1F, 0x13 and even > 0x18 !) a little bit especially the with the subpackets: > preferred symmetric/hash/compression algorithms, policy URI and key flags > (I think it would even make semantic sense to put them on 0x18s). > > Anyway to do this I need to generate those signatures (of course) and > I'd like to use the wonderful code of gnupg :-) > Could you perhaps point me to the useful function names where I can > modify these signatures (0x1F,0x13,0x18) and the functions that are > used to inject subpackages? > Was a great help when you pointed me to the write_header()/etc > functions before :-)
build-packet.c:build_sig_subpkt() sign.c:make_keysig_packet() sign.c:update_keysig_packet() David _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
