A colleague of mine asked me to send him a signed e-mail of fingerprints
of some keys that I'd personally verified earlier in the day. I'd also
signed the keys, and published the signatures to a public key server.

I argued that my signature on the publicly available keys was as good as
the signed e-mail of the fingerprints. He seemed to think that the
public key server introduced the possibility of meddling with the keys
(although I pointed out that if this was the case, my signatures
wouldn't verify).

Is a signed e-mail containing a fingerprint equivalent to signing a key?

James

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Reply via email to