-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 David Newman escribió:
> The 8 char key ID is enough for one to retrieve your public key from > any keyserver, however, if that person would like to sign your key they That is what I thought, they would use the KeyID instead of the fingerprint (but then somebody pointed the Key ID is the last part of the fingerprint, a fact I had not noticed before). So I can either tell them the last part of the fingerprint can be used to retrieve the key, or give them my biglumber url... I chose to give my biglumber url, since if I ever have to change my email address, I can just update my key, and they could retrieve the update key, with the new UID linked to the new email address... > need 2 things from you. At least one picture ID and your key's > fingerprint. Chances are, if someone has your business card they have That is if we are talking about some kind of notary or assurer... But if I give the card to a cousin, he would not require my picture ID... And some other people would not really care if they know my real identity, as long as they know my real email address... As an example, I am in an alliance of players of some multiplayer game. While everybody was invited by somebody they know in real life, some just knew the one who invited them. So the first time I went to a barbecue with them, everybody was talking to the other people referring to them by their nicknames... However, it would be important to exchange our email addresses, and it would be a good thing to use gpg... sometimes a player send his "game sensitive information", like user and password... or even worst, they post them into the alliance forum (and we know there have been attempts to penetrate the forum...). Well, this was just a real example about situations where real ID is not important... > for including the fingerprint instead of just the keyID. They are not > going to use the fingerprint to retrieve the key, only to verify that the > retrieved key is yours. Right, now I am convinced the whole fingerprint is better... Best Regards -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJI/rz8AAoJEMV4f6PvczxAAc4H+wZPt5Hqs/vpeC6keddFDihd 64gSIosy6cI84pyd0rB4qJKBSfcNzKpFVz6Ow7JVvRlNyHQ8SDeIrKjlVSXsFhEJ YA9vuUPsZIDcIXEdDsbbVVm2RWDONXgtz4pdAOQReKPZN+9C5E4Tb2G5oyfNVLZW gtlIWIQ0m0JAzg97ZceXPp3Z9laH3+EzRz7zTEWXsSj9TH1WdkFkYr8n2MQ418Xh 6i1o5DZC8liC7qFtWJjMZJzJ5maqfOTheBXFqslVbN5KYfjxO4qW9RIzafM2pCUe E6MrF/R6Icp/ICALIxQ226px5q7ColB4tO4KfHeTXHzZE14KBLDNDFSb0JQZ2FY= =0B0A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
