-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> From: Petr Uzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 16:15:02 +0200
> Subject: Re: confusing message: 'no pinentry'
srevilak> This sounds like normal behavior for su. "su -" is supposed
srevilak> to simulate a full login of the target account; it discards
srevilak> most environment. By contrast, "su" (without the minus)
srevilak> doesn't discard the environment.
petr.uzel> I know all of this. My question was whether the gpg
petr.uzel> behavior under specified circumstances ('incorrect'
petr.uzel> GPG_AGENT_INFO env. variable) should not be adjusted
petr.uzel> somehow.
petr.uzel>
petr.uzel> In other words, I know how to solve my issue (use 'su
petr.uzel> -'/unset GPG_AGENT_INFO/killall gpg-agent/whatever), but
petr.uzel> I'm uncertain that all other gpg users know it
petr.uzel> too. Especially when the message about missing pinentry is
petr.uzel> quite confusing.
Ah, sorry I misunderstood.
Steve
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (Darwin)
iEYEARECAAYFAki9TpQACgkQX7YJI4BuyDQMzQCg5DyR3ucEq8BxNQthNxAHrPjS
OiYAnicckZDRr/hQgB9NuymJCC8clA3f
=nKiJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
