-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > From: Petr Uzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 16:15:02 +0200 > Subject: Re: confusing message: 'no pinentry'
srevilak> This sounds like normal behavior for su. "su -" is supposed srevilak> to simulate a full login of the target account; it discards srevilak> most environment. By contrast, "su" (without the minus) srevilak> doesn't discard the environment. petr.uzel> I know all of this. My question was whether the gpg petr.uzel> behavior under specified circumstances ('incorrect' petr.uzel> GPG_AGENT_INFO env. variable) should not be adjusted petr.uzel> somehow. petr.uzel> petr.uzel> In other words, I know how to solve my issue (use 'su petr.uzel> -'/unset GPG_AGENT_INFO/killall gpg-agent/whatever), but petr.uzel> I'm uncertain that all other gpg users know it petr.uzel> too. Especially when the message about missing pinentry is petr.uzel> quite confusing. Ah, sorry I misunderstood. Steve -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAki9TpQACgkQX7YJI4BuyDQMzQCg5DyR3ucEq8BxNQthNxAHrPjS OiYAnicckZDRr/hQgB9NuymJCC8clA3f =nKiJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users