Faramir wrote: > Thanks for the answers. I am a bit confused about if I should use > names like aes256 or codes like S9.
Six of one, half dozen of another. I think it's generally for the best if people use names, since they're easier to read and harder to screw up. > Also, do I have to include all the cipher/digest/compress algorithms > available to my installed gpg, or just one or two? The idea would be > "if you can, use this one, if not, do as you wish/can" This is not really possible with GnuPG. setpref is used to advertise _capabilities_ to people far more than it is to advertise preferences. It appears to me to be badly misnamed. personal-thingy-preferences are the actual preference list, but is only applied to traffic you generate. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
