-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
Todd Zullinger wrote: > Alan Olsen wrote: >> Those patches do not fix my build problems. (It is running out of >> memory compiling numerix.ml.) >Odd. I built it again before sending the patches, on an up to date Fedora 8 >box (i386). > It did compile. I didn't test any further though. I believe the problem has to do with the version of OCAML I am using. 3.10.1 seems to have problems. 3.10.2 has been released. I am going to try that. I am also using x86_64 and that may have something to do with it. >> Your patches are also for a much earlier version of numerix. >Yeah, the numerix patch was against the version of numerix included in the sks >tarball. > Packaging numerix and making sks use the system numerix would be better (if > possible), > but it wasn't something I looked at. The patch takes a bit to apply. The code still needs patching at that point in the code. The code location has changed quite a bit though. >> I have sent mail to the SKS author to see if he has any ideas. >Good luck. :) Probably need it. It has been a chore to get anything working with SKS. Probably since I am using a version of Fedora 9 out of Rawhide... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 9.5.3 (Build 5003) wsBVAwUBSCN1f2qdmbpu7ejzAQrcSAgAvNsY4zSZafIfUOqUzmGl2jzm0ILGUwJT Gg3VrWAT4e8AEquCy2OBablfjM81sLkeB3D9SAHLYxInnB67JpKHLyKzBY7KcKXD TawOZRMuKLUqTTK7Ripj3VRFYLOKa7pflbxzpAHUuejbJMD1A7fGw+fyyJZuXxE3 /ur9XFUp0l1NdDbPzULbpau37/5x6d+kK01KnZRBi/9hEDGRH4j0RhAUKkXTzszX sNqwa1KhySO9V7uv8miRK6qxsSEGdrnABdF+ILCj4ywo01FoKc1koSU+/asz4Fxt 68h+mJ3LOUeadRcJr7NvB/qb/Z58l1T8zgNYlJW1D+8ZjFxz0ehQqA== =56nO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
