Am 21 Apr 2008 um 9:43 hat David Shaw geschrieben: > On Apr 21, 2008, at 9:30 AM, Mark H. Wood wrote: > > > So, GnuPG 1.4 implements OpenPGP. GnuPG 2.0 implements OpenPGP > > and S/MIME. > > > > So 2.0 is "better" than 1.4 if you need S/MIME, otherwise not. > > > > So, perhaps 1.4 should be GnuPG and 2.0 should be GnuPG-Plus. > > (Please, no "++"!) > > How about: > > 1.4 == GnuPG Classic > 2.0 == GnuPG Plus > > David
As gpg2 seems to generate a lot of confusion, I second the renaming to make the different purposes as clear as possible. The main and most important difference is the addition of S/MIME, so it should be part of the new name and command. How about: gpg == GnuPG == GnuPG Classic gpgs == GnuPG+S == GnuPG+S/MIME Dirk _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
