On Wed, 09 Apr 2008 14:44:22 -0500 "Robert J. Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [sigh] [bigger sigh] > If you're going to misquote someone, at least do it accurately. The > original poster's exact words were "is the only Free Software > implementation of S/MIME that has passed the Sphinx interoperability tests." Yes, exactly. That's why I asked what else was tested. I don't see any misquoting. As you say... > The parse is ambiguous. > You can read it as meaning "only one Free > Software implementation was submitted to Sphinx, and it passed". You > can read it as "other Free Software implementations were submitted to > Sphinx, and only KMail passed". Yes, exactly. That's why I asked what else was tested. > Or you can do what I do, which is recognize that it's an ambiguous > parse, and assume that the person speaking is a reasonable human being > who is probably not engaging in semantic trickery. Accusing people of > malfeasance when there is no clear evidence any occurred is a > McCarthyism into which I do not wish to fall. 'malfeasance' is a strong word. Alas, it seems that you might be slipping already! :) > Ingo is a reasonable human being. I didn't say otherwise. have a banana Paul -- Note to self: do as Robert does. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
