Simon Josefsson wrote on 19.01.2008 17:15: > "Vlad \"SATtva\" Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [snip] >> If I understand this correctly and not missing something terribly here, >> keyservers just looked at newly uploaded key, thought "huh? I already >> have that subkey in place, and this 0x18 sig too!", and discarded it >> without going into much trouble of analyzing any binding sigs' >> timestamps (maybe marking them as duplicates). >> >> Could anyone confirm this behavior? > > I had similar problems with many key servers, until I switched to > subkeys.pgp.net which is (if I understand correctly) documented to only > point to key servers with full subkey support.
subkeys.pgp.net is the first server I send keys to. However, as you can see, it's subkeys support isn't enough: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x8443620A&op=vindex sub 2048R/070E0B73 2006-12-21 sig sbind 8443620A 2006-12-21 __________ 2007-12-31 [] <<<< Policy URL: http://www.vladmiller.info/services/cert.html sub 2048R/7D57ED51 2006-12-21 sig sbind 8443620A 2006-12-21 __________ 2007-12-31 [] <<<< Policy URL: http://www.vladmiller.info/services/cert.html And it's not just an output bug. If you import that key it'll end up like this: gpg: NOTE: signature key 070E0B73 expired Tue 01 Jan 2008 03:26:21 NOVT pub 4096R/8443620A 2006-12-21 uid Vladislav V. Miller (aka SATtva) uid Vladislav V. Miller (aka SATtva) <@> uid Vladislav V. Miller (aka SATtva) <@> uid SATtva (openPGP in Russia project admin) <@> uid Vlad Miller (for private contacts only) <@> uid [jpeg image of size 7403] sub 2048R/070E0B73 2006-12-21 [expired: 2007-12-31] <<<< sub 2048R/7D57ED51 2006-12-21 [expired: 2007-12-31] <<<< > /Simon > > -- SATtva | security & privacy consulting www.vladmiller.info | www.pgpru.com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
