Sven Radde wrote:
> Just out of curiosity: Does this (or, rather: should this) have
> implications for your trust of the signer's key?
There are two schools of thought on this.
1. "Beats me. You get to define your policy, not me."
2. "If this guy's control of his keys and passphrase is so poor
that a spammer can use them, then there is no sensible policy
which would consider that key uncompromised."
Personally, I side with #1, but my own personal policy is #2. YMMV.
_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
