I would like gpg to be able, when using symmetric ciphers, to produce `anonymous' output -- that is, output such that one cannot be sure that gpg produced it, or that a given passphrase does not successfully decode it. (That is, if you enter the wrong passphrase, you get garbage instead of an error message.)
I would like to be able to do this so that, for example, I could run gpg repeatedly, and someone who was decoding the data would not know whether he was on the right track. I also might want to combine gpg with another approach, e.g., XOR-ing the target file against another file. Again, the idea would be that `anonymizing' gpg's output would make it more difficult for someone to untangle such combined approaches; the general idea is that the ability to produce `anonymous' output would make gpg a more flexible part of a larger toolkit. I am very new to gpg, and I have no idea what would be involved in adding such a feature -- but I was hoping for a command-line switch for `anonymous' mode (and I take it that when deciphering in `anonymous' mode, one would have to specify the desired algorithm). Would this be difficult? --Mark W. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
