Doug Barton wrote: > It almost sounds from what you're saying above that there actually is an > argument for RSA's hash firewall being "better" than DSA[2] here, but if I > correctly understood what you said later in the thread, the margin by > which it's "better" is so small as to not be worth considering. Is that > more or less correct?
I think I was the one who made that argument and said the margin was ultimately not worth considering, so I hope you'll forgive me answering this one despite it being addressed to David. Anyway. Yeah, I think that's a fair assessment. Is there a benefit? Yes. Does the benefit matter? Not really. Or, as David said, if your property is surrounded by a 1000-foot fence, a 1001-foot fence is not going to be much better. If the bad guy can clear a 1000-foot fence, the additional foot probably isn't going to stop him. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
