> Ultimately, you trust _someone_. Which is precisely the point I made: > trust underlies everything. Without that fundamental trust, there's no > point talking about authenticity.
If that someone is yourself, do you still call it trust? Some things about myself I only trust, such as my memory about certain things. Other things I am completely sure of, and don't call trust. That I won't all of a sudden hit myself in the face for no reason, for example. My ability to look at the fingerprint on a paper, and compare it to the on on the screen, is something I'm completely sure I'm capable of doing correctly, so therefore I call a key I have verified authentic, not trusted. Maybe you call it trusted, and we are just arguing about the meaning of words? Oskar _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
