-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Stefan wrote: > But that doesn´t mean PGP 5 is insecure in any way, it´s just outdated > and not RFC2440 conform, right?
GnuPG is an RFC2440-conformant application. PGP 5.0 is not RFC2440-conformant. It far predates RFC2440. The two applications do not work together well. That's not to say they can't be finessed into working together. They clearly can be. However, I would not trust my financial data to a communications system that was built of parts that did not interoperate well. That said, your security model is your own lookout. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin) iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJGnPhXAAoJELcA9IL+r4EJPYEH/i689ewuA+F3lnGomQULd0/z UO+tM/Cpxkvdpbo8Pmx3dz4HznjobVZajEicuT0MRSbGtgWBNB0lDm7rN6mwPFl1 QHDBZlYSGjTu6wSc0f/G2j8wGHzWjJWKIUlknfENd3KAsNBiQ6gebVDdyUY4WGf5 ZfnOkM6YYfzRicVHGG6uNrGrFJ0dUSQ2YBrblYgxeBOCI3IsuGvrND3rG8CjNzvK llXgA4j8Hy9DG5u+DoU5lMxJP5oSUfeHO+81lbAchhz0dijY9HgeY0EG25vR75OB anopJrc3byST4c2csPC7z2K/tKEM0355VaMqRUYg4c2N/7d2+3YWTxKpJHFH9Bw= =VSvJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
