On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 12:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > PLEASE DEFINE NOTICEABLE! If it is still only 0.xx ... 2 seconds for > your stated conditions which is multiple users with the sender using
A second is definitely noticable and even half a second is often annoying. I regular take part in discussions with a dozen or so people and some of them have the habit of using --throw-keyid. Browsing througbn these message takes quite a while mainly due to the decryption time. With larger keys it would get more annoying. > time for me to type them. In other words, it may take me far longer > to type the pass-phrase than it does to decrypt or decrypt + verify Not to me as I cache my passphrase for an hour or so. > I am going to create is to sign just a few files only a few times > per week or month anyway. It's up to you. I still believe that there are hidden bugs in gpg which are easier to exploit than to break such a larger key. Shalom-Salam, Werner _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
