At 6:44 PM +0200 4/14/07, Alexander Feigl wrote: >[...]
>Looks good. > >Can anybody test it with 2.0.3 on Mac? > >For me it look like there are problems with saving to key to disk. Importing >the key with 1.4.7 and then checking the key with 2.0.3 seems to work last >time I checked it (x86 Linux). At least as long as the key file is not >touched by 2.0.3. If Enigmal would use the same gnupg components as gnupg >2.0.x this would explain the behaviour. The key gets written out incorrectly >and gnupg 1.4.7 fails because of this. > >Is there any easy way to view and compare the key material (prime product, >public exponent...) of a key ring? > >Alexander Feigl Alexander, I think you may have found the cause of the confusion (mine): When I run Thunderbird+Enigmail, I am using gpg 2.0.3 (on an Inter Core 2 Duo Mac), not gpg 1.4.7, and the keyblock is imported by Enigmail+gpg 2.0.3. Therefore the problem wouldn't be related to Enigmail per se, but to gpg 2.0.3. Now, why gpg 2.0.3 would write out your key incorrectly, in such a way that gpg 1.4.7 fails to recognize it? Charly _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
