On Monday 19 February 2007 17:51:02 Jason Harris wrote: > On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 11:31:55PM -0500, David Shaw wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 11:11:37PM +0100, Bruno Costacurta wrote: > > > I updated the expiration (via gpg --edit-key using expire option) of my > > > key and (re)sended it to a keyserver (via gpg --send-keys [my key id]) > > > to keyserver subkeys.pgp.net. > > > However key is still not updated after few hours. > > > What are normal delays ? > > Keys do get temporarily "trapped" on the SKS keyserver network until > keyserver.kjsl.com copies them over to the rest of the planet. > > BTW, your subkey isn't currently usable: > > sub 2048g/0CC897B5 2006-06-11 [subkey] > Key fingerprint = CCE0 5315 0022 9460 0337 6C6F 4253 1C9A 0CC8 97B5 > sig 0x18 2E604D51 2006-06-11 [skey EXPIRED 2006-12-08] [keybind, hash: > type 2, e0 0f] sig 0x18 2E604D51 2006-06-11 [skey EXPIRED 2006-12-08] > [keybind, hash: type 2, e0 0f] > > > There is not an easy answer to that question. subkeys.pgp.net is not > > actually a keyserver, but rather a collection of (at the moment) 5 > > different keyservers. When you use it, you get one server from the > > pool in a round-robin fashion. Generally speaking, any given > > keyserver in the pool that you update reflects the update immediately, > > but frequently people update one keyserver in the pool, but then check > > for the update from another server in the pool which hasn't gotten it > > yet. > > NB: I think if GPG printed the IP address of the keyserver it used, it > could end some of this confusion. > > Specifically, these were in a batch update from SKS to onak/OpenPKSD/pks/ > etc. (all times are TZ=UTC): > > 2007-02-06 23:02:08.290952260 display_new_sig: new sig 28 by 2E604D51 > added to 2E604D51 Bruno Costacurta <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-06 > 23:02:08.291023778 display_new_sig: new subkey sig by 2E604D51 added to > 2E604D51 > > these were first seen from pgp.nic.ad.jp: > > 2007-02-16 13:41:00.597122207 display_new_sig: new sig 1 by 2E604D51 > added to 2E604D51 Bruno Costacurta <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-16 > 13:41:00.597182829 display_new_sig: new sig 2 by 2E604D51 added to 2E604D51 > pubmb02 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > and these were in another batch update: > > 2007-02-18 23:02:27.870255691 display_new_sig: new sig 71 by 2E604D51 > added to 2E604D51 Bruno Costacurta <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-18 > 23:02:27.870319946 display_new_sig: new sig 72 by 2E604D51 added to > 2E604D51 pubmb02 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Well, I still cannot see any refresh of my keys...sent 4 days ago. Should I try again ? Thanks. Bruno _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
