Qed wrote: >No, since the security issue is not related to the underlying >cryptographic algorithms(e.g.: some time ago ElGamal signatures were >discovered to be weak, so in newer version of GnuPG the generation of >such keys is disabled).
They were not weak, there was an implementation error in GnuPG. Since it is (according to Werner, I don't know enough of it to judge that statement myself) very hard to implement this correctly it was dropped. -- ir. J.C.A. Wevers // Physics and science fiction site: [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.xs4all.nl/~johanw/index.html PGP/GPG public keys at http://www.xs4all.nl/~johanw/pgpkeys.html _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
