On Wed, 05 Apr 2006, David Shaw wrote: > On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 12:30:42PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > > I notice that if I have both, a IPGP and a PGP CERT RR that GnuPG fails > > to import the key some of the time: > > [..] > > > } ;; ANSWER SECTION: > > } peter.palfrader.org. 43200 IN CERT 6 0 0 > > FFsAyW1dVK7hIGuvhN56r26UwJx/ > > } peter.palfrader.org. 43200 IN CERT PGP 0 0 > > mQGiBDgp0YcRBACN9s8EycXRsu9ym3Sjou1N..... > > > > Is having them both not supported or is there a bug somewhere? > > At the moment, GnuPG will take whichever it sees first (the PGP or the > IPGP, but not both). So given round robining, if you have both, it > will seem to flip back and forth between the two. I'm thinking about > having GPG favor one or the other in these cases (probably PGP since > if it has already fetched the whole key, it may as well import it > rather than go to a web page or keyserver somewhere).
On the other hand the key that is fetched via DNS has serious size constraints - DNS limits the RDATA to 64k and I think GnuPG further limits this to 16k. In my case I have significantly stripped down my key in order to store it in DNS, so maybe going to the keyserver or the location specified in IPGP might be a good idea. > The reason it is not fetching from the IPGP record you have there is > there is only a fingerprint, and you must have a --keyserver defined > for it to fetch the fingerprint from in that case. Do you have a > --keyserver defined? Ah, now that I do it works nicely. Thanks! Maybe gpg should say that it wants to have a keyserver in this case? Cheers, Peter -- PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** messages preferred. | : :' : The universal | `. `' Operating System http://www.palfrader.org/ | `- http://www.debian.org/ _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users