On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 01:41:08AM +0300, lusfert wrote: > David Shaw wrote on 27.11.2005 1:05: > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 12:18:08AM +0300, lusfert wrote: > > > >>David Shaw wrote on 26.11.2005, Сб 18:30: > >> > >>>U+FEFF is the BOM character. It was in the original document, so it's > >>>in the signed document as well. > >>> > >> > >>Then why this BOM character appears in clearsigned text if option > >>--textmode (-t) is used? As I understand from its description in man > >>file GnuPG threat input file as text. But BOM is a file, not text > >>signature; then why U+FEFF appears in output text? Or I'm wrong? > > > > > > I'm not sure what question you're asking here. The BOM character is > > in your original document. GnuPG doesn't modify input text, so > > therefore the BOM character is in the output text as well. If you use > > --textmode, GnuPG canonicalizes line endings to CRLF, but again does > > not change actual text, including the BOM. > > > As I understand GnuPG handles input as text file, not as plain text, > even if option -t used?
For clearsigned files, effectively --textmode is always set. David _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
